This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Electronics Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Telecommunications Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Computing: Networking Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Networking task force (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors: [[Personal area network#Wireless Personal Area Network|WPAN]] The anchor (#Wireless Personal Area Network) has been deleted by other users before. The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links. Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error

Reason for my suggestion of merging WirelessHD and WiHD: They seem to be the same thing. Peter S. 15:47, 17 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

The use of acronyms in this article is either incorrect or unclear. Could someone confirm or fix the following:

"The WirelessHD (WiHDTM^TM) standard" - TM?

"WDHI uses 40 MHz of bandwidth" - Wireless High-Definition Interface?

Thanks Otus (talk) 15:30, 5 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Confused: Is WiDi (introduced as a proprietary Intel technology) actually the same thing as what's mentioned in this page? The strangeness is that the string "WiDi" isn't in fact mentioned anywhere on this page. --ButterSoda (talk) 22:41, 20 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

WiDi uses 802.11n 2.4Ghz, so at least at phisical medium level it's a different thing. Probably the redirect should be removed! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.224.66.227 (talk) 11:58, 8 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

There were a lot of incorrect redirects for WiDi and Wi-Di, including to Miracast somehow. "WiDi" correctly refers to Intel Wireless Display (WiDi). As such, it now redirects there. To deal with confusion over the name, I've created WiDi (disambiguation), which includes WirelessHD. The other wireless display technology articles need work. I'm doing the best I can while I research the topic as part of my profession, but I can't dedicate much time to editting Wikipedia articles, unfortunately. I'm glad to have finally tidied this up! :) Nitwon (talk) 15:26, 7 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Intel announced that newer versions of their WiDi-Driver for PCs would be Miracast-compatible. So I would call WiDi a precessor of Miracast (Miracast is standardized since autum 2012 by the WIFI-Alliance, Intel is a member there). And Micacast currently uses the 2.4 and 5 GHz bands. --MichaelK-osm (talk) 12:51, 14 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Not really - check out http://www.whdi.org/WHDISIG/FAQ.htm and the question: "How does the Video Modem Work?". It clearly states that the transmission can contain errors, only that they're not visually significant. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.69.119.42 (talk) 05:33, 29 October 2010 (UTC)Reply