This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Science This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Technology This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology History of Science This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

the URL for the webpage www.technoscience.net no longer works Stevenmitchell 16:01, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I find the fact that the International Journal of Feminist Technoscience is listed as an external link on the Technoscience page to be a first good step in including Feminist Technoscience as a subcategory of Technoscience, but additions must be made. Might I suggest a subcategory be added to this page entitled "Feminist Technoscience" that highlights the major works of academics in this field (such as Jean Baudrillard, Donna Haraway, Lucy Suchman and Wendy Chun etc.)? Taylor Bohl (talk) 18:25, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to add descriptions of different applications of technoscience, specifically, the social, political, and environmental implications of the subject. These will be grouped under a "Facets of Technoscience" heading, with brief examples provided for each section. I would also like to add a scentence to the overall concept description relating technoscience with perceived "necessities" in daily life. Cited work will include that of Edward Woodhouse, Sergio Sismondo, Langdon Winner, and others. Jaymarion21 (talk) 19:32, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to see how the different definitions of Technoscience coexist and interconnect with one another. It would be interesting to see how the philosophical aspect as well as the more common interpretation of the term exist together to shape our knowledge and understanding of Technoscience. Akhird (talk) 17:11, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The references to Gaston Bachelard as an original source for the name are quite doubtful. I am not sure that Le matérialisme rationnel contains the birth of the term technoscience… (At least we can note that the page in French never mentions Bachelard.) Baba Arouj (talk) 22:29, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]