This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Microsoft (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.MicrosoftWikipedia:WikiProject MicrosoftTemplate:WikiProject MicrosoftMicrosoft Computing Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Computer hardware task force.

Why not merge this with the Surface 2 article? They have almost the exact same info barring the technical specifications and operating system.

Oppose, those two differences are large enough. The biggest difference is the Surface 2 runs Windows RT and the Pro 2 runs full Windows. Also, each device will get different reviews, so two articles will help understand the differences. Frmorrison (talk) 14:32, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that the "reception" category is showing a certain amount of bias against the device and showing only one side of general opinions. I realize not all discussions are balanced, but this seems entirely too balanced toward one (negative) side.80.47.255.119 (talk) 21:56, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not just possible bias. And what is funny is that unlike the original Surface Pro, the vast majority of the reviews I've seen for the Pro 2 have been positive. This editor must have gone out of their way to just sift out the negative. --147.108.253.252 (talk) 19:22, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I read the Microsoft Surface article earlier and decided to head to the Surface Pro 2 article. When I first read the article, I found out that the "Microsoft" brand name was missing in the article's title. So do you think the right move will be to move this article and Surface 2 to a page with the "Microsoft" brand name preceding the two product names? Will it be right to move Surface 2 to Microsoft Surface 2 and Surface Pro 2 to Microsoft Surface Pro 2? Hope someone answers this in no time. Thanks. Japanese Rail Fan (talk) 08:02, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion moved to Talk:Surface 2 due to similarities in topic. For other comments, please comment there. Thanks. Japanese Rail Fan (talk) 14:25, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Surface 2 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 12:30, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

All of the Surface articles are currently very incoherent.

I propose that we standardize on a common structure.

See: Talk:Microsoft Surface Pro 3#Standardize all the Surface articles Illegal Operation (talk) 22:37, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]