This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC This article was accepted from this draft on 8 October 2024 by reviewer I dream of horses (talk · contribs). Literature Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Sociology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Books This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook

This is a ambiguous and confusing article, because its proporting to be about Williams's concept, but it is actually about other writers interpretation of his concept

Its important that the article objectively explains Williams's concept and uses his quotes, correctly attributed to his texts. At the moment none of Williams's texts are attributed in the article. Surely the most reliable references are the books Williams himself wrote ?

I am happy at some stage to write the article, but I would need to remove most of the current article to do so. Structure of Feeling first appears in Williams book with Michael Orrom 'Preface to film' (1954). It then appears in various defenitions in many of his subsequent books. It changes sense in his later works and is superseded by a Gramscian version of Hegemony (in 77's Marxism and Literature)

I think its interesting and relevant to include other scholars interpretation and use of the concept, as well as criticisms of it, but these must come after William's own definitions, and they must be contextualised as other scholars interpretation and uses, and not inferred to as Williams's concepts (as is currently the case)

it is best to use literary examples that Williams himself used to explain his theory Izzizm (talk) 21:36, 7 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

thank you - this page was only a start and i really look forward to you're improvements Structureofeeling (talk) 12:36, 6 February 2025 (UTC)Reply