This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Statistics article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Start a new topic Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 3 months

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (center, color, defense, realize, traveled) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

	Statistics was one of the Mathematics good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones Date Process Result June 11, 2006 Good article reassessment Delisted

This  level-2 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Mathematics Top‑priority This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics Top This article has been rated as Top-priority on the project's priority scale. Statistics Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.

Text or other creative content from this version of Business statistics was copied or moved into Statistics with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization: Kathy Lange (December 1, 2006). "Differences Between Statistics and Data Mining". http://www.dmreview.com/ DM Review. {{cite news}}: External link in |agency= (help)

I edited this page to remove that section a while ago, but it was quickly reverted. It barely has any sources, and though it contains interesting information, I don't think any of its information belongs in an article covering the entire field of statistics. Any information that we decide does belong in the article should go to the "Statistics in academia" section. Kzyx (talk) 19:03, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Today I ended up agreeing with you, and re-deleting the section that you deleted. Cheers, Mgnbar (talk) 13:58, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Should the link be updated or removed? Fredrik-hammar (talk) 14:12, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find the link that you're talking about, either at Statistics or at Data science. If you're talking about editing the Data science article, then that would be best done at Talk:Data science. Sorry if I've misunderstood you. Mgnbar (talk) 12:16, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, should have been more clear but was writing from mobile. The link is under Statistics#Specialized disciplines.

This part of the source:

* Data science (see also: Data science#Relationship to statistics)

There is no Relationship to statistics section in Data science. Fredrik-hammar (talk) 12:52, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see. It's gone now. Thanks. Mgnbar (talk) 14:02, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I'm a Wikipedia noob, but I noticed the Bayesian statistics section has an example that reads a bit out of place to me:

"For statistically modelling purposes, Bayesian models tend to be hierarchical, for example, one could model each YouTube channel as having video views distributed as a normal distribution with channel dependent mean and variance N(0, 1), while modeling the channel means as themselves coming from a normal distribution representing the distribution of average video view counts per channel, and the variances as coming from another distribution."

Typos aside ("statistically modeling", putting N(0, 1) after the word "variance" instead of "normal distribution"), this doesn't seem to be the most informative or recognizable example out there (there's a fresh hyperlink to YouTube). At the very least, it seems like it should have a textbook citation somewhere but I can't track one down—in contrast to the classic eight schools example that you'll find everywhere in online workbook and textbooks.

As it stands, it seems like the example is a non-sequitur, and not a very informative one because it should probably be something like: video views distributed as N(μ, σ²) with μ distributed as N(0, 1) and σ² distributed as N(0, 1).

~2025-34141-64 (talk) 22:45, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]