This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Transhumanism Low‑importance Singularity Summit is part of WikiProject Transhumanism, which aims to organize, expand, clean up, and guide Transhumanism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page for more details.TranshumanismWikipedia:WikiProject TranshumanismTemplate:WikiProject TranshumanismTranshumanism Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. For more information and how you can help click Show: If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page for more details. Quick help: Main talk page Article layout Links to Transhumanism information and Wikipedia:Research resources Writing about religion and Article development Citing sources, Verifying sources and Original research Assume good faith and be civil See changes to: Core articles Transhumanism article New Transhumanism articles edit - history - watch - purge To Do List: Join WikiProject transhumanism and be bold Show off a userbox with {{userWPA}} or {{userWPA2}} and attract potential members Help with articles. See this month's adopt an article. Help out with the To-do lists Be consistent Use a "standard" layout for transhumanism related articles (see: The perfect article, and Featured articles) Add Transhumanism navigation template on the bottom of all transhumanism articles; (use {{Transhumanism}} or see navigation template) Add Transhumanism info box to all transhumanism related talk pages (use {{Wpa}} or see info box) Add [[Category:transhumanism]] to the bottom of all transhumanism related articles, so it shows up on the list of transhumanism articles Maintenance / Etc Find/cite sources for all positions of an article (see citing sources. Try to expand stubs, however, some "new" articles may be neologisms, as this is common with positions on theories on life and may be suitable for deletion (see deletion process) Watch the list of transhumanism related articles and add to accordingly (see transhumanism articles) And always write for an encyclopedia. Create Notable transhumanist articles Shorten / merge into others Expand a transhumanism stub Your immediate attention false choice into false dilemma - discuss whether you are for or against this merge here Clarify references in Transhumanism, using footnotes. Alternative views Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative viewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative viewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative viewsAlternative views Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It seems that there aren't many real references in this article and that all present ones should be moved to external links. Unless I'm missing something if there are no objections I will go ahead and move them in a few days. Theoretick (talk) 09:31, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I added two citations, should probably delete others. Theoretick (talk) 10:04, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reference quality material is usually fully cited and put in "Further reading" to be used in future citations. The two references you added aren't adequate, they are primary sources affilated with the subject itself. The article needs to be sourced from third-party sources, such as those now in Further reading. If you remove the further reading, the subject will technically fail the general notability requirements (at least two reliable third-party sources that provide significant coverage of the subject). Then some deletionist will speedy it as spam. Yworo (talk) 15:13, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thank you, got it. In re-examining some of those "Further reading" links it would seem they are sufficient for at least establishing primary date of the conference. I'll remove primary source citations and reference those. Theoretick (talk) 19:45, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Great! It is of course OK is use some primary sources: for example non-controversial, non-self-serving material from the subject's website, provided that the majority of sources are third-party. Yworo (talk) 23:28, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No summits since 2012?

What happened at the summits?

Press coverage? Abstracts? 2600:1000:B12B:AC8C:84F6:2CB7:DB36:CB82 (talk) 16:18, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]