Talk:Script doctor

Is it accurate to refer to script doctors as "rescu[ing] failing film projects." Towne was a script doctor on The Godfather, and Sorkin was a script doctor on Shindler's List. Were these films really "failing?" Watchsmart 03:41, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Changed. Watchsmart 06:53, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced list

Hi, With no malice or ill will, I have relocated this list here so that it can be improved. THere are several problems with it. First it is a list, and encyclopedias should generally have prose instead of lists. Second, the list not put into a useful order (e.g., chronological, by genre, etc). Thirdly, the list is completely unreferenced. If Wikipedia is to be a reliable reference source, we cannot have unreferenced lists like this. It is just too easy for jokers to add in false information. For example, I could have easily added in the false claim that John Malkovich was a script doctor for the filmPretty in Pink and it might stay in the article for YEARS, even though it is completely false. Nazamo (talk) 18:45, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Daniele Luttazzi? Who is? Sources? ................................................................ Notable script doctors

added additional defintion of script doctor

Ive added additional defintion of script doctor, unrelated to the first definition, not sure how it could be done otherwise, I hope this is ok?2829 VC 13:55, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.