This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments Japan: Business and economy / Tokyo Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks.JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Business and economy task force. This article is supported by the Tokyo task force. WikiProject Japan to do list: edit history watch purge Peer review: None A-class review: None Featured content candidates –  Articles: None Pictures: None Lists: None Good article nominations: Add requested images to articles that need them. Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions. Improve and expand Japan-related stubs. Create some requested articles. Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English. Assess unassessed articles Anime and manga Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Animation: Asian / Films Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Asian animation work group. This article is supported by the Animated films work group. Film: Filmmaking / Japanese This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm This article is supported by the Filmmaking task force. This article is supported by the Japanese cinema task force.

@LainEverliving: – I see you've been working extensively with this article. You'll notice that I removed a number of citations, all to the non-credible ANN Encyclopedia, but I got to reading the article, and I'd like to say your style and writing is very-well done, as well as the organization, but there seems to be a much heavier emphasis on the studio's individual productions and the awards those productions received than is necessary. There's too much in the prose regarding these individual works themselves, and not enough about how they're important to Saru's cultural, historical, or creator-related identity. In that way, it feels like the article is more about these works, rather than the studio itself; in other words, the article stagnates into what I would call being "off-topic." Of course, it's fine to mention all of these works in the prose somewhere, if you'd like, but the amount of content about them, some with little to do with the areas I've mentioned, feel very off-topic. I was wondering if you would be willing to try cleaning that up; it would make for a more Saru-centralized article, which is the goal, as I see it. Sarcataclysmal (talk) 08:19, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Kabushiki gaisha is a joint-stock company. Isn't it more appropriate to say "Science SARU J.s.c." or even something else? Was the company named specifically that somewhere (citations are missing for this)? Fallbackintoreality (t • c) 22:00, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disregard the above edit. Fallbackintoreality (t • c) 22:02, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]