This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Psychology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Companies Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments

== Hey guys....

What about the controversy related to IIM CAT 2009(Common Admission Test). This must be mentioned at this page. ==

Did you read the article?Iulus Ascanius (talk) 18:37, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I read the article. This is the external link---> http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/IIMs-to-review-Prometric-CAT-contract/articleshow/5312443.cms

There is already a discussion of the issue in the article, with multiple links. Iulus Ascanius (talk) 00:22, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hello all... Why this article is put under the psychology?--Yogendra.rai (talk) 19:16, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. I removed the project banner.Iulus Ascanius (talk) 21:56, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The "The Prometric Values Promise" section seems to be a marketing advertisement. And the "Controversy" section has been deleted recently. CapitanPrimate (talk) 16:44, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. This article contains excessive promotional language. Baltakatei 17:21, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Prometric was acquired by BPEA in January 2018.

http://www.bpeasia.com/private-equity/our-portfolio/ https://www.prometric.com/en-us/about-prometric/pages/history.aspx — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2620:0:D50:4048:8924:8594:D824:70A7 (talk) 20:50, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tampered-computers-gave-neet-applicants-a-lifeline/article19360023.ece. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. twisted. (user | talk | contribs) 16:18, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined.

Hello, I have a professional connection to Prometric. Due to this conflict of interest, I am not editing the article directly. I am submitting the following request for review by an uninvolved editor in accordance with Wikipedia’s COI guidelines.

In April 2024, Prometric partnered with Mursion to introduce virtual‑reality‑based simulations into its assessment programs. ^[1]

In August 2024, Prometric partnered with CURVE Testing Centers to deliver the “CURVE Test,” a standardized youth baseball skills evaluation.^[2]

Earlier, in February 2024, the company released its AI‑Enhanced Item Writing Badge to accelerate and improve exam‑content development.^[3]

A September 2024 industry analysis reported that Prometric generated more than USD 150 million in EBITDA, noting sustained acquisition activity and market interest in the company.^[4]

In March 2025, Prometric secured the industry’s first U.S. patent for AI‑powered assessment technology.^[5]

In July 2024, Prometric acquired EdPower, a K–12 education technology company.^[6]

Prometric was recognized in December 2024 as part of the 2025 GSV 150 list of digital learning and workforce development companies.^[7]

This request consolidates recent, verifiable developments from 2024–2026 using reliable sources. The changes improve neutral, encyclopedic coverage by adding documented updates on Prometric’s technology initiatives, acquisitions, partnerships, recognition, and financial performance. All proposed content complies with Wikipedia’s neutrality, verifiability, and sourcing standards. Thank you for your consideration. ~2026-50799-5 (talk) 20:25, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A response has not yet been received for this question.

  Request closed for inactivity  

• The above edit request has not received any responses over the past 3 weeks (22 days in total).
• Discussion is often a key component to implementing edits, and requests may be adversely affected when they fail to garner input from either reviewing or requesting editors. In light of this — and as a safeguard — this request has been declined as needing more discussion.^[1]
• The COI editor is urged to revive stalled communications by making contact with local editors on those editor's own talk pages, and then by moving those discussions back to this talk page.
• The COI editor may also wish to broadcast requests for edits at the talk pages of the WikiProjects which govern this article. Those projects are usually listed at the top of an article's talk page.

Regards,  Spintendo  06:33, 22 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. Unclear request

	This LLM-generated text has been collapsed and should be excluded from assessments of consensus.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
'''Subject: Request to revise phrasing for neutrality''' Hello, I would like to request a revision to the sentence “They were replaced with/by Pearson VUE” in the *Prometric* article. As currently written, this wording may unintentionally introduce brand favoritism or marketing language by highlighting a specific company name in a context where the detail may not be necessary for understanding the subject. Under Wikipedia’s '''Neutral Point of View (NPOV)''' policy, article content should avoid language that could be interpreted as promotional or that gives undue weight to a particular commercial entity. Naming a specific replacement vendor without additional context or without citing reliable, secondary sources may give disproportionate prominence to that brand. '''Proposed neutral revision:''' Remove the current phrasing to be more general, non‑promotional* It is not necessary to share who won the contract. '''COI Disclosure:''' I work for Prometric and therefore have a conflict of interest. I am not editing the article directly and am submitting this request for review by an uninvolved editor in accordance with Wikipedia’s COI guidelines. Thank you for reviewing this request. ~2026-50799-5 (talk) 20:26, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for now: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. - Otherwise (Talk?) 01:02, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

Hello editors, I would like to request a small organizational update to the Prometric article. COI disclosure: I work for Prometric, so I will not edit the page directly and am instead submitting this request for review by independent editors. Requested change In the Business section, the article currently includes the sentence: “In January 2023, Prometric renewed its partnership with CFA Institute for a multi‑year deal.” Because this statement refers to a contractual partnership, not general business operations, it would fit more appropriately under the Contracts section. Proposed action Please move this sentence from the Business section to the Contracts section without modifying the wording or citation. No other changes requested. Thank you for considering this request.

COI Disclosure: I work for Prometric and therefore have a conflict of interest. I am not editing the article directly and am submitting this request for review by an uninvolved editor in accordance with Wikipedia’s COI guidelines. ~2026-50799-5 (talk) 20:27, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

~2026-50799-5 (talk) 21:26, 23 January 2026 (UTC)C. Plett[reply]

Done - Otherwise (Talk?) 01:03, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]