This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Food and drink: Beverages Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Related taskforces: /  This article is within the scope of the Beverages Task Force, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive. Food and Drink task list: edit history watch purge To edit this page, select here Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink: Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish Participate in project-related deletion discussions. Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this. Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here. Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages. Water Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Water, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Water supply-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WaterWikipedia:WikiProject WaterTemplate:WikiProject WaterWater Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Brands Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Maine Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MaineWikipedia:WikiProject MaineTemplate:WikiProject MaineMaine Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page needs a thorough edit. I only made a dent. --Kslain 21:56, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think Poland Spring uses cheap plastic for its bottles; I think there should be a section on that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.190.160.82 (talk) 13:28, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, no sections on what you, or I think, unless you have published those thoughts in a reliable source. See the policy Wikipedia:No original research. Now if there was a significant body of such criticism published in reliable sources (not blogs, etc...), we'd need to include it. Is there? GRBerry 14:26, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TayshaunPrince24 has been adding text about Poland Spring's environmental record. I've removed this text for three reasons. First, the text is copy/pasted directly from the articles that are referenced, which is unacceptable around here. Second, some of the text comes off as sounding very advert-like. Third, the text added is largely redundant. The Eco-shape stuff is already covered by the end of the Water sales section; the Fryeburg text is covered by the Controversy section. Maybe if the text is rewritten it can be included, but most certainly not in the way it was. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 20:23, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is said that roughly over 100 million gallons of water are purchased from the Fryeburg Water Co., in Fryeburg, Maine. Does anyone know how much water are taken from all of the springs? How many gallons of water is taken total, and most importantly how much as a percentage of the total, from each individual spring? I think this would be important information if it can be sourced.Jcook5 (talk) 17:39, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was redirected to Nestle which is obviously inappropriate. Enigma^msg 22:11, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Stevenmitchell (talk) 19:10, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 5 September 2023 and 15 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Wikiallshi, T5555555T (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by T5555555T (talk) 21:11, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Controversies tab needs updated ownership info. Still indicates Nestle ChandlerMc9 (talk) 23:50, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]