Talk:Paradox Development Studio

Clausewitz Engine

EUIV was the first game to use Clausewitz 2.5, according to http://www.moddb.com/engines/clausewitz-engine

46.21.99.29 (talk) 20:02, 14 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Multithreading

Disclosure: I am a developer at Paradox Development Studio. This page states that Clausewitz is a single core engine, which is outdated information. The engine is multithreaded as of Hearts Of Iron III: For the Motherland and can thus utilize multiple cores. Games starting with Crusader Kings II were multithreaded from launch. See also: https://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/index.php?threads/about-the-clausewitz-engine.994409/#post-22316258 https://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/index.php?threads/slow-down-and-lag.839291/#post-18955412 Sharded (talk) 08:35, 28 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Sharded: I've removed the line since it does not have a WP:RS and the information isn't particularly important to an generalist interested in the studio. If you can pick out a source from this Google custom search for video games reliable sources which talks about the threading for the engine, we can add some information back in. --Izno (talk) 12:26, 28 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
@Izno: Thanks. No need to add additional information. Sharded (talk) 18:12, 28 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

work!

So, since this page was made, I'll get to work linking the games they developed to the dev studios instead of the paradox publishers (paradox interactive). If anyone else wants to collaborate on any paradox pages/things just let me know. daintalk   06:21, 29 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

(Suggestions) A new section entitled "Notable Alumnis"

I would like to suggest a section entitled "Notable Alumnis" listing all current and former notable alumni/employees who have their own biographical article on Wikipedia such as Johan Andersson (game developer) and Jon Shafer. In principle, this idea could be applied to other game development studios as well. --Legion (talk) 14:10, 2 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

  • I don't think this is a good idea. If they were indeed notable, they should belong in prose in the history section, explaining what made them notable at the company. A simple list (as we see with school articles) is just messy and often times unsourced, as well as not very encyclopedic. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 19:06, 2 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.