This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Maritime / Middle East Start‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Maritime warfare task force Middle Eastern military history task force Africa: Libya Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Libya (assessed as Low-importance). International relations Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Europe This article is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject EuropeTemplate:WikiProject EuropeEurope ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. North America This article is within the scope of WikiProject North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject North AmericaNorth America ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. Arab world Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arab world, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Arab world on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Arab worldWikipedia:WikiProject Arab worldTemplate:WikiProject Arab worldArab world Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. NATO (defunct) This article is within the scope of WikiProject NATO, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.NATOWikipedia:WikiProject NATOTemplate:WikiProject NATONATO

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors: [[Panavia Tornado#Tornado GR1A/GR4A|Panavia Tornado GR4A]] The anchor (#Tornado GR1A/GR4A) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before. The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links. Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error

We need to change the current chain of command to reflect the agreement of the Canadian to take command of NATO Forces in this mission. See main article dicussion of the Libya Conflict. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.49.140.94 (talk) 16:34, 25 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Agree.Is it the Italian or Canadian?Other dictionaries are better (talk) 11:43, 26 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Doesn't Gadaffi have any ships? Also, and though it's a bit WP:FORUM, who the hell thought up this crummy name? Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie Say Shalom! 03:48, 24 March 2011 (UTC) Edit: Wait, he does if I remember correctly, but I am too lazy to find the sources. Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie Say Shalom! 04:04, 24 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

he has a few, but he's not allowed to go anywhere in them! Another question - If this operation is a naval blockade to prevent any arms being delivered - who is preventing them coming over the land borders, which are 3-4 times longer than the Libyan coastline? Is that (to be) another military operation, or part of this one? Regards, Lynbarn (talk) 14:24, 24 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

...to be commanded by royal canadian air force lt gen Charles Bouchard?--Hodgson-Burnett's Secret Garden (talk) 18:46, 25 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Operation Unified Protector, noclador (talk) 13:39, 26 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

See NATO document on Operation Unified Protector. 75.47.131.253 (talk) 14:28, 31 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

I have removed the {{dubious}} tag and added another reference. MOD confirms that Cumberland is part of United Protector, not Ellamy. ShipFan (talk) 04:23, 1 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

The US just have 1 frigate in this operation i heard they where still spending 4 million dollars a day participating in the Libying intervention with 50 planes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.21.210.12 (talk) 10:43, 9 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110405/ap_on_re_us/us_libya_air_force —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.21.210.12 (talk) 10:46, 9 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Barack obama's policy.Other dictionaries are better (talk) 08:17, 3 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

I don't know if this logo is protected by copyright law, because it is from NATO, and I am unfamiliar with fair use law. Would it be OK to add in this logo? I received it through the NATO media updates. http://www.nato.int/nato_static/assets/pictures/stock_2011/20110415_110415-logo-unified-protector.jpg I believe that it would enhance educational value. Acadamicnut (talk) 16:34, 24 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

http://navynews.co.uk/archive/news/item/491 Phd8511 (talk) 21:16, 25 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi, it is just to say that Security Council res. 1970 was adopted on 26 february and not on the 17th.

cheers

Zupippu (talk) 16:16, 19 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Operation Unified Protector. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110325141257/http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2011/03/24/libya-gadhafi-rebel-misrata.html to http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2011/03/24/libya-gadhafi-rebel-misrata.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:19, 1 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Operation Unified Protector. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20121019130612/http://www.aftonbladet.se/senastenytt/ttnyheter/inrikes/article12812778.ab to http://www.aftonbladet.se/senastenytt/ttnyheter/inrikes/article12812778.ab

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:47, 10 March 2016 (UTC)Reply