Talk:One Direction

Good articleOne Direction has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 5, 2012Good article nomineeListed
September 16, 2012Good article reassessmentKept
February 1, 2025Featured article candidateNot promoted
April 19, 2025Peer reviewReviewed
May 18, 2025Featured article candidateNot promoted
On this day... A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on July 23, 2025.
Current status: Good article

Photo change to collage photo I created

I have plans to update the lead photo with a recent collage photo of the members that I made on Commons for the lead image on the article Gzavala6 (talk) 00:33, 21 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. The image should depict how they looked like in the band, however, all the images are of them post-breakup. Also, it is simply unnecessary to have a collage when there is a perfectly fine picture of them all actually together, that can be used in the infobox. We are very lucky with 1D as they have a lot of good images together, while other articles (eg NSYNC) only have collages because there are no appropriate images of them together as a band. jolielover♥talk 04:43, 21 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Even though they are not together anymore, I believe it is best to use the collage photo I made and made it all five members in the same collage photo Gzavala6 (talk) 05:14, 21 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Why though? What makes it 'better' than the current photo? jolielover♥talk 06:10, 21 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed with jolielover, though I'd also like to see the collage photo. there's also plenty pictures of concerts on wikimedia if you feel it needs replacing. we could, i suppose, include the collage photo further down the article, maybe in the band members section. EmergentAnarchy (talk) 10:59, 21 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I actually did put a collage of them with current photos in the Hiatus subsection, but it was removed per feedback from Wikipedia:Peer review/One Direction/archive1 jolielover♥talk 11:01, 21 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I think it'd depend what Gzevala's collage looks like as to whether we should include it. Though all their individual articles are linked and have photos, so it might be a bit redundant. EmergentAnarchy (talk) 11:06, 21 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's the exact same as my collage, or maybe just 1-2 pictures changed. Yeah, I think it's redundant... it's like having a picture of Paul McCartney today on the Beatles page. You can check his page to see how he's doing, no use of it on the Beatles page. jolielover♥talk 11:09, 21 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
While we're on the subject, are there any pictures of Zayn taken in the last decade? there's none on commons or his article from after 2015. EmergentAnarchy (talk) 11:11, 21 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Nah. That's another thing, all the members are struggling for pics post-breakup. Zayn in particular doesn't even tour so even harder to get pics. jolielover♥talk 11:22, 21 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Anybody going to Louis's/Harrys/Nialls tours this year, please upload to commons, pretty please!!! jolielover♥talk 11:23, 21 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
He's started touring in the last couple years (starts one this week iirc), so hopefully someone will post something from those. btw, i was hoping to upgrade his article to A class, but someone else needs to sign off on it EmergentAnarchy (talk) 11:25, 21 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I thought he cancelled but it was just the American tour dates. jolielover♥talk 11:27, 21 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.