Talk:Object Process Methodology

Wikification

I began to wikify the article a bit, but I think it is not enough. Plus the images are still unsourced. Hervegirod 20:36, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I did a bit more, but it's still messy. Images appear to have been removed. Wikified as part of the Wikification wikiproject! JubalHarshaw 17:31, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

14.08.2011 - updating article and adding information to make it useful. Vainolo —Preceding undated comment added 07:43, 14 August 2011 (UTC).[reply]

6 Mar, 2016 - Updated article, added a full information based on ISO 19450 standard and official book. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snhot (talk • contribs) 07:54, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In this edit I changed one section to a block quotation because it was lifted from Edward F. Crawley's forward to Dov Dori's 2016 book Model-Based Systems Engineering with OPM and SysML and was clear copyright violation. Looking through the superordinate section, Object Process Methodology § Design, I see other chunks of text that are lifted verbatim from Dori's 2016 book, so I suspect that more of this article may be plagiarism and/or copyright violation (since Dori's 2016 book is copyright Springer Science+Business Media). I don't have time to check and/or rewrite the entire article now, so I am adding Template:Copypaste to the article. If someone will thoroughly compare this article to Dori's books and confirm that large sections of this article are NOT copied and pasted from them, then the Template:Copypaste can be removed. Biogeographist (talk) 14:51, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I found a copy of the book and removed some text that was clearly copy/pasted from it. The editor who added the infringing material seemed to weave in snippets of text from the 2016 book with other material (their own words? Another source? The 2002 edition of the same book?) which made hunting for the material very tedious. I did my best, but I can't guarantee I caught all the infringing material. Thanks Biogeographist for bringing it up. Ajpolino (talk) 15:50, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ajpolino and @Biogeographist after the CP listing, I've gone ahead and checked this article against the book, and have had to remove about 20,000 bytes worth of content. I've tried to be as careful and non-destructive as possible, but quite honestly, I don't understand most of this. Regardless, I think a fair portion of this article should just be removed completely; It's way too detailed. I've also nominated most of the images for deletion as they're also copied from Dori's book, so I'm going to remove the {{copypaste}} tag and mark the CP listing as solved for now. If anyone finds any other content, please ping me (and if significant, list it on CP) and I'll be happy to try to remove it. — Berrely • Talk∕Contribs 15:01, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2018-01-17 The links in Further Reading are dead. Mark Underwood (knowlengr) 03:33, 18 January 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Knowlengr (talk • contribs)

I have removed the dead links. Biogeographist (talk) 13:22, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:52, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.