Talk:Numberblocks

Protected request

The characters section is missing. Pi tau rho alpha (talk) 18:23, 3 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want made. Please detail the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. The "Characters" section was recently removed because it was completely unsourced. Day Creature (talk) 19:02, 3 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Numberblocks Magnetic Cubes

Can you create Numberblocks Magnetic Cubes 1-10 tomorrow Numberblocks Magnetic Cubes will be avaliable on August 14th 2026 Simeonterefe0508 (talk) 21:15, 15 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Edit request 25 July 2026


  • What I think should be changed (format using {{textdiff}}):
  • Why it should be changed:
  • References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button):

SanityBros2134 (talk) 17:01, 25 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Channel is a brain, making numberblocks into food. The link is a channel https://youtube.com/@braincrafthq-s7u?si=-HFWwHrnKe2v2s0A

References

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want made. Please detail the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Alpha Beta Delta Lambda (talk) 17:23, 25 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Should the fanmade content stay?

Don't get me wrong: I'm all for fanmade content. As someone who is in the Numberblocks community, I am also a fan of the channels mentioned in the "Fanmade content" section. But I don't know if the section itself is really necessary to Wikipedia. KrazyMan79 (talk) 13:54, 4 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

From my point of view, Wikipedia is a place for answers to questions. It should have all knowledge that could possibly be found. If anybody wonders who “RodolfoYT12345” or someone related is, they should be able to consult this section. It’s knowledge (even if not very valuable) that should, in my opinion, be preserved. Γ+2 (talk) 15:22, 4 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
I understand. But I also feel like sometimes, Wikipedia can be strict in terms of what information should/shouldn't stay, hence why I'm a bit iffy on this. KrazyMan79 (talk) 15:24, 4 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
The only thing I would understand concern about is the lack of citations, but there are also external links at the bottom of the article to back it up. Γ+2 (talk) 15:26, 4 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
it should stay honestly, it's a big part of the community Thepersonthatsalive (talk) 21:14, 22 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.