This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Automobiles Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Television This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

I hate to say it, but this article comes across as non-encyclopedic. As much space is devoted to complaining about the show's biases as is spent describing the show itself. Complaints should be relegated to a minor section at the bottom, not one of the primary article foci. SeanAhern 13:01, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Much better now! Thanks. SeanAhern 04:00, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone explain this term in context to the article? No where in this article does it state why he's been described as such. The term "publicity seeker" can be misleading having a negative connotation (as it relates to this article is irrelevant and takes away from it) and as such does not fall in line with the neutrality that Wikipedia supposedly prides itself on. All I'm saying is that if one is going to use such bold statements about an individual...it needs to be explained why in the article...otherwise it just comes off as a person (or persons) taking a vile shot at another in a Wikipedia article for whatever reason they have which goes against the guidelines I thought was set forth. 98.21.204.171 (talk) 22:33, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I hate that guy with the burning passion of someone who actually likes cars, but this show has been on for decades. Goss has a page, why wouldn't Davis have a page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.255.170.233 (talk) 07:22, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

According to MotorWeek's official website, the programme has now surpassed 4,000 episodes. AlexGRFan97 (talk) 13:33, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]