Talk:JavaScript engine

SpiderMonkey

I find it strange that my edit has been reversed, considering that it is the only official JavaScript engine, directly from the author of the language. Moreover, it's not only used by the Mozilla browsers, but to extend C applications as well (I myself use it for this purpose).

Of course, there are other ECMAScript implementations, but JavaScript is actually the name of the Mozilla implementation of ECMAScript. I am wondering if the article should be renamed to ECMAScript, possibly, in this reguard...

Side note: JavaScript is not exactly the same as JScript, which violates ECMA on several accounts

--66.11.179.30 20:30, 9 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

Well. This is just a simply list of engines. No need to put too much information here. --minghong 06:11, 25 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

This article vs. List of ECMAScript engines

Latest comment: 20 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

It is simply confusing to have both. I for one can't tell why these two lists are different and how does one decide whether a particular implementation goes in the ECMAScript list, JS list, or both. (And the pages don't explain that either). For example, is Narcissus not ECMAScript interpreter? --asqueella 21:45, 24 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.