This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Environment Low‑importance This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Climate change Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class because it uses a sub-category of Category:Environment stubs on the article page. If you agree with this assessment, please remove this message. If you disagree with this assessment, please: Change the above "class=stub" to "class=start" or another applicable class per Wikipedia:WikiProject Environment/Assessment#Quality scale; Remove the stub template from the article.

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sherb1.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:58, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

I've just reverted to a June version to eliminate multiple copyvios introduced by a student. See WP:IEP for the background to this cleanup effort. The first three references I checked all had multiple sentence fragments unchanged in this version. I screwed up the edit summary for the reversion, but the three I looked at were http://www.simmatecusa.com/advantages/greendev/, http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/07/16/wal-marts-eco-labeling-mandate/, and http://www.costar.com/josre/JournalPdfs/06-Barriers-Green-Development.pdf. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 02:10, 16 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

This article should be expanded to include more theories/concepts relating to green development. The article is maintaining a neutral viewpoint right now but has a very narrow subject topic (natural burial), when there are many other aspects of green development to be discussed. The article also only has one source, so more sources need to be found to back up the existing claims and to introduce new claims into the article. Viewpoints are underrepresented. Ebellamy16 (talk) 23:28, 16 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

I agree the article is a bit flaky. To be honest, I can't see any connection between natural burial and green devlopment (as defined in the introduction) so I've removed the section. Somehow someone needs to find convincing sources about green development/planning. Sionk (talk) 20:24, 13 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Agreed. Maybe this article should be merged with Sustainable development. Seems to be pretty similar. There's also overlapping material in Low-impact development (UK), Low-impact development (U.S. and Canada) and Green infrastructure, although the latter two focus on water resources. Moreau1 (talk) 22:57, 13 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

This article was the subject of an educational assignment supported by Wikipedia Ambassadors through the India Education Program.

The above message was substituted from {{IEP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 20:13, 1 February 2023 (UTC)Reply