Talk:Functional calculus
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Garbage
This article is absolute garbage. Someone needs to fix it before it gets taken down. Dr. Universe (talk) 10:52, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
- Would you care to be more specific? Charles Matthews (talk) 11:28, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
- @Charles Matthews: Maybe if you pinged me when I wrote that 11.5 years ago, I would have been very happy to be more specific! It's a bit too late for that now though since I don't remember :) Dr. Universe (talk) 02:03, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
- I removed the garbage, and left something thin and pathetic in it's place. linas (talk) 18:26, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
- @Charles Matthews: Maybe if you pinged me when I wrote that 11.5 years ago, I would have been very happy to be more specific! It's a bit too late for that now though since I don't remember :) Dr. Universe (talk) 02:03, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Disjointed
This article seems to be disjointed, jumping from generic to specific examples with little warning and mostly avoiding describing what functional calculus actually is.116.90.140.41 (talk) 23:55, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
- Any article that uses the phrase "If M is an operator" in the introductory section with no explanation of what the word "operator" (which has many, many meanings in English) means ... needs serious work.
- (Regardless of the fact that a mathematically sophisticated reader might be able to almost figure it out.) 2600:1700:E1C0:F340:4C85:FDC4:21FA:39B8 (talk) 22:29, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
- See comments above. I removed the garbage, but did not leave anything more accessible. You'll have to wait for someone else to do that. linas (talk) 18:28, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
Article is cryptic and idiosyncratic
> If f is a function, say a numerical function of a real number, and M is an operator,
What is an operator?
> there is no particular reason why the expression f(M) should make sense.
Why should we expect it to make sense? This statement would be no less meaningless if one replaced "operator" with "banana" or "shade of blue".
> If it does, then we are no longer using f on its original function domain. In the tradition of operational calculus, algebraic expressions in operators are handled irrespective of their meaning. This passes nearly unnoticed if we talk about 'squaring a matrix', though, which is the case of f(x)=x2 and M an n×n matrix.
"This passes unnoticed", and indeed, much of the article seems weirdly pompously conversational. jon (talk) 20:17, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- I removed all of these sentences. They were garbage. What's left is quite thin, though. linas (talk) 18:30, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.