This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC This article was accepted on 4 April 2013 by reviewer Theonesean (talk · contribs).

This article has been subjected to repeated edits by an anonymous user who repeatedly adds the same content containing factual errors, misleading narratives and personal attacks.

Among the most blatant errors are:

1) Factual error #1 "removed from the company."

This contradicts numerous statements later in the article, not to mention multiple cited references, including linked references 19 ^[1] and 20 ^[2] that clearly state Mr Hare voluntarily resigned from the company and was thanked for his efforts:

"Mr Hare was a co-founder of the Company and now having seen the Company through the IPO he has tendered his resignation. Mr Hare remains a shareholder in the Company.

Philip Wolf, chairman of the Company, thanks Mr Hare for his contribution and leadership over the years, from inception and as one of the founding members in 1999, to having built up the Company to its present position as one of the largest online companies in Europe, and specially for his services as Independent Director since the Company went public."

2) Misleading narrative #1 "eDreams moved quickly, asking their shareholders for authorization to “Discharge to Mr. James Otis Hare for the exercise of his mandate as director "

The user does not mention that every Board member is "discharged" from the company each year. And that the "discharge" is a discharge of liabilities welcomed by each Board member.

3) Misleading narrative #2 The user seems to insinuate that Mr Hare, who had already retired in 2010 and no longer held an executive position, was single handedly responsible for the company's performance in 2014, with no mention of the actual executives in charge, nor the other Board members.

Memdreamer (talk) 05:39, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are a corporate shill and its very obvious. FileCabinet26 (talk) 20:01, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on EDreams. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130116224016/http://ta.com/news/news_detail.asp?id=133 to http://www.ta.com/news/news_detail.asp?id=133

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:32, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User Memdreamer and some other anonymous edits make it very suspicious that there are attempts to inorganically alter this page for the sake of company promotion.

FileCabinet26 (talk) 20:00, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I share this opinion and suggest a more balanced take on their "customer service", this should reflect the fact that there is a Facebook page of disgruntled customers and several reddit pages reflecting the same issues. The Wikipedia page is clearly written to promote the company. Wikipedia should not be used as advertising EDW82 (talk) 14:35, 12 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]