Talk:Drug checking
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
 | The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
Bad sources
The hype about "adulterants" is basically just a smokescreen for the fact that using MDMA and similar drugs is inherently harmful, allowing any ill effects to be blamed on "bad batches" and "impurities." If it's really true that drug checking improves safety, maybe the people writing the article can get some real citations in that refer to proper scientific studies, instead of just links to tweets and websites from organizations pushing this practice? Predestiprestidigitation (talk) 15:54, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
- That's somewhat unfair. The reports from the National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre and the Parliament of Victoria are not from organisations involved in testing. I will admit that this is such a new area for research that the published academic work is limited to the studies by Giné, Benschop, Measham, and Saleemi. Further independent research is underway in Switzerland and New Zealand (https://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/research-drug-checking-impacts) When that is published, we can update the article.Happyinmotion (talk) 18:56, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
Pill testing News
There should be more information about pill testing news in here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cdreue (talk • contribs) 19:26, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.