This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Doug Ford article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Start a new topic Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7Auto-archiving period: 2 months

This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Doug Ford was nominated as a Social sciences and society good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (November 12, 2018). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard. This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism. If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Politics and Government This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance). Canada: Ontario / Toronto / Politics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario. This article is supported by WikiProject Toronto (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Political parties and politicians in Canada. Conservatism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination. Logs and discussions Move logs: Doug Ford, Jr. Doug Ford (politician) Doug Ford Jr. Doug Ford Discussions RM, Doug Ford, Jr. → Doug Ford (politician), Not moved, 25 November 2016, discussion RM, Doug Ford Jr. → Doug Ford, No consensus, 11 March 2018, discussion RM, Doug Ford Jr. → Doug Ford, Moved, 8 June 2018, discussion

Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to living or recently deceased subjects of biographical content on Wikipedia articles. The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article: You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours (except in limited circumstances) Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator.

Hi,

Suprised noone has added sections on the news that the ICO has ruled Ryan Amato must provide his emails as well as NYT article noting Therme lied about its previous work in Europe.

I truly believe this content should be updated, but understand these are very contentious issues which may be paint Ford negatively without further context. I am prepared to make these updates, but was wondering if anyone had any pushback or an idea as how to best position these edits. I think the creation of a controversy section seen on other head of government's wikipedia pages would best. While this would be quite long, it is understandable for a government with 9 years under its belt.

Will make these edits in the next few days pending any feedback, but these types of updates should surely be included. PaulCrosby42 (talk) 21:43, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Every editor is free to add material, yourself included.

There are already controversy sections, although they are not recommended. It's better to cover controversies as they arise. For example, the controversies surrounding the science centre is better included in a section about Ford's policy on the Science Centre. TFD (talk) 12:13, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Made edits to both sections. Happy to discuss these if anyone believes they are too contentious and/do not provide value to the page. However, I do think updates to relevant controversies should be included on this page. PaulCrosby42 (talk) 20:23, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I added some info about how he gives out his phone number to random people which I was surprised wasn’t stated in the article anywhere. [1] Is there a reason for this? I looked through the archives of this talk page and I couldn’t see it being discussed anywhere. Thepharoah17 (talk) 01:53, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This topic is discussed twice in the article. it was originally in the relationship with conservative section and then a new edit made its own section. The topic is relevant I am just not sure where its more appropriate to be discussed. McCIrishman (talk) 17:15, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Dougford has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 May 19 § Alanturing until a consensus is reached. 𝔅𝔦𝔰-𝔖𝔢𝔯𝔧𝔢𝔱𝔞? 18:50, 19 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]