This article was nominated for deletion on 16 March 2018. The result of the discussion was merge.

	This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Computing This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing

The article had a proposed deletion by the same anonymous IP that also forward a proposed deletion for XL (programming language) which I found a plausible cited for and then de-proded. It immediately raises concerns about whether the proposed deletion on this article should remain. In an ideal world I would go off and spend effort locating citations and article improvements .... but I don't have it.

Should this article ever be proposed for deletion this should not be for a speedy delete but for a full deletion discussion and a merge to XL (programming language) considered .... though that merge may be difficult, time-consuming and ultimately disruptive and no capable person may have bandwidth to do it. Djm-leighpark (talk) 10:26, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• The XL citation you added to XL (programming language) was incorrect- it referred to a completely different language by a different research group that was unrelated to the XL language described in the original article, and for which this "concept programming paradigm" is claimed. Did you fully read the article before you added the citation? This so-called "concept programming" is not a well-defined computer science term, has no citations to the computer science literature, and is a manufactured term by a hobby language author.96.250.126.152 (talk) 13:37, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• • Indeed on reflection I may not have read this sufficiently. I have a further problem calling Christophe de Dinechin a hobbyist, while his article refers to him as a computer scientist, though either or both could be correct. its quite possible all three as a set should be brought to AfD ... for consideration to merge/deletion. Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk) 14:14, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]