Talk:Code rate
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Code rate = information rate?
I doubt that. Information rate is usually measured in bit/s, while code rate is unitless. Mange01 (talk) 22:29, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- Quoting Huffman & Pless, page 88.:
"For a (possibly) nonlinear code over Fq with M codewords the information rate, or simply rate, of the code is defined to be n-1 logqM. Notice that if the code were actually an [n, k, d] linear code, it would contain M = qk codewords and n-1 logq M = k/n."
- Apparently Information rate is defined differently in some coding theory publication than within the rest of the information theory and data communications fields. The most common definition of information rate is useful bit rate or net bitrate. Search at http://books.google.com and you'll see. Currently Information rate is redirected to bit rate, where a bit/s definition is given. How can we solve that at Wikipedia? Should we avoid the term? Or create an article where we define it as number of useful bits per time unit, where a time unit either may be the bit transmission time, or a second.
- Wikipedia articles that were using the coding theory definition are: Code rate, Entropy rate, Block code and Hamming code. I replaced the term by "code rate" in the latter two articles. In Block code both definitions occured before my change.
- Examples of articles using the bit/s definition: Information theory, Error detection and coding, Shannon–Hartley theorem, Channel capacity, Spectral efficiency, Classical information channel, Eb/N0, Peak Information Rate, Maximum Information Rate and Committed Information Rate.
- Mange01 (talk) 09:29, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.
