This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Software Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Software.

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE. ShawnChen Sirius (talk · contribs) has been paid by ClickHouse, Inc..

"Its technology works 100-1000x faster than traditional database management systems, and processes hundreds of millions to over a billion rows and tens of gigabytes of data per server per second. With a widespread user base around the globe, the technology has received praise for its reliability, ease of use, and fault tolerance."

Is there any evidence to this claim? Any benchmarks, user numbers, quotes etc.?

Kbojens (talk) 14:18, 15 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi, you can check this link

https://tech.marksblogg.com/benchmarks.html Lola Rennt (talk) 13:58, 21 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

After reviewing this article, I've added

This article may contain excessive or inappropriate references to self-published sources. Please help improve it by removing references to unreliable sources where they are used inappropriately. (March 2022) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

This article may rely excessively on sources too closely associated with the subject, potentially preventing it from being verifiable and neutral. Please help improve this article by replacing such sources with more appropriate citations to reliable, independent sources. (March 2022) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

and

Some of this article's listed sources may not be reliable. Please help improve this article by looking for better, more reliable sources. Unreliable citations may be challenged and removed. (March 2022) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Of the 11 references on this article, only one is from a reliable, secondary source. All of the others are self-published, unreliable sources closely associated with the subject of the article.

Briskmad (talk) 07:22, 4 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

It's important to mention that because it's supported by Russian companies it conrains spyware 80.146.183.219 (talk) 12:06, 5 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Do you have any evidence of this? ClickHouse inc. has no russian ownership and is completely divested from its Yandex roots. 90.212.44.169 (talk) 13:30, 15 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

I added the chDB, LibreChat, and Langfuse entries to the Acquisitions section and fixed several citation errors in that section. I am employed by ClickHouse, Inc. (disclosed on my user page). The additions are factual and cited to independent sources where available (InfoWorld, SiliconANGLE, BigDATAwire, TechCrunch). Any editor is welcome to review, trim, or revert. Going forward I will use {{request edit}} for substantive changes. ShawnChen Sirius (talk) 03:41, 4 June 2026 (UTC)Reply