Talk:Christopher Null

AFD

This article was nominated for deletion. The result was: no consensus. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Null. · Katefan0(scribble) 16:34, 14 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

About Null

I've read some of his movie reviews. While I know this is considered poor taste, I find the man to be lacking a certain depth and experience in his life that would allow him to adequately review a movie. I think he is just elitist and has an inflated ego, so much so that he founded Filmcritic.com. Critics should have a familiarity with humanity, literature, and such and he has desolved it down into only "Did I like this movie or not?" - Cyborg Ninja 03:37, 1 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

[For] example, his views on Nakata's 'Ring' (1998) "Ring is very atmospheric and often creepy, especially in its last half hour, but it's hardly chilling enough to keep you up at night." Concentrate on the movie next time, not your popcorn and iPhone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.82.124.197 (talk) 09:07, 19 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
Wikipedia is not a forum. --82.136.210.153 (talk) 03:23, 11 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

suggestion: the google card divorce debacle

in reference to http://www.wired.com/2015/05/google-wont-let-forget-divorce/ and https://twitter.com/christophernull/status/596381664252731392. I think this is a notable event. Thoughts? 73.38.55.164 (talk) 19:01, 7 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.