Talk:Certainty effect
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Bad example
What in gods name does that example show? In the first question, option A is technically the better choice. In the second question, option B is technically the better choice. The questions aren't very relatable at all. In any case, it certainly doesn't help demonstrate the Certainty Effect. I think it should be removed. 24.130.212.167 (talk) 04:21, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
"It is an idea introduced in prospect theory. "
Is it, though? It was already discovered 30 years prior by Maurice Allais - Allais paradox — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.66.121.1 (talk) 12:56, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.