Talk:CXML
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Procurement PunchOut was merged into this article. The discussion was closed on 6 June 2016 with a consensus to merge. The original page is now a redirect to this article. Its history now serves to provide attribution for the content in this article, and it must not be deleted as long as this article exists. |
NPOV
There is a lot of hyperbole in this article -- it sounds like a marketing piece. Tone it down, actually describe the protocol and its history, discuss disadvantages, refer to alternatives. And if you're going to mention PunchOut, you're going to have to explain it. For an example of a better protocol description, see FIX protocol or, dare I say, Electronic Data Interchange. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevegt (talk • contribs)
- Uggh. You're right. It is painfully POV. --Habap 19:35, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, Please Tone it down. A lot of it is indeed hyperbole.
This text is taken from the faq from www.cxml.org
Would be nice to see an example such as http://acs.lbl.gov/~dang/tmp/NetLogger/cxml_002dexample.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.26.87.226 (talk) 16:25, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
That Example is for "compactXML" This is about "Commerce XML" Which is real XML based, so that example is not relevant. Pinkertonfloyd (talk) 22:35, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
It would be good to see a discussion of cXML compared to RosettaNet, standards from GS1 etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.37.244.52 (talk) 22:59, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Toned down slightly (who judges "easy"?), and added description of PunchOut from the FAQ jens (talk) 16:05, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- Issues appear resolved, I've removed the NPOV template, please use {{POV-section}} or better yet {{POV-statement}} for sentences, then detail issues here. This will help address them in a timely manner. - RoyBoy 01:48, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.
