Talk:Build system (software development)

Feedback from New Page Review process

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
To merge Build system (software development) into Build automation for context and overlap. Klbrain (talk) 13:00, 18 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Should be merged with Build automation or Integrated development environment.

Noleander (talk) 18:08, 2 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

This article overlaps a LOT with other existing articles, such as Integrated development environment and Build automation. Readers do not benefit from such duplication & overlap. Although arguments can be made to distinguish this article from the other two: the SOURCES do not make such distinctions, and we need to do what is best for readers. Noleander (talk) 18:09, 2 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
I agree that "Build system (software development)" should be merged into Build automation. As far as I can tell, they are so closely related that a single article can cover both and the subtle difference (if any) between them.
However, I feel that Integrated development environment (IDE) should stay separate. My understanding is that an IDE bundles together many different tools, including a text editor and a debugger and (sometimes) a build system like make (software) or Gradle. The text editor and the debugger is designed for a human to interactively work with at every step. The build system is intended to be set up once and then, when activated, automatically go through a series of actions without further human interaction. The IDE can be seen as analogous to a kitchen that contains many tools. Some of those tools (the measuring cups and mixing spoon) require a lot of human interaction to do their thing. The oven, like a build system, once it's been set up, can do its thing more-or-less automatically. Many kitchens don't have an oven, like IDEs focused on interpreted languages usually don't include a build system. Many ovens are not in a kitchen, like historically the make tool was popular long before IDEs became popular. --DavidCary (talk) 18:07, 11 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
  checkY Merge completed Klbrain (talk) 13:00, 18 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Proposed merge of Incremental build (build system) into Build system (software development)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Conceptually overlapping since basically all build systems support incremental builds. Not too much content at source page to warrant a dedicated article. – SD0001 (talk) 06:50, 4 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

I've amended the target to Build automation, given the merge outcome in the above section. It looks like the Incremental build (build system) is broader than just the 'build system', so the merge seems reasonable, but not just into the Tools section. Klbrain (talk) 13:12, 18 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.