Talk:Boozt

Comments left by AfC reviewers

  • Comment: Hello and thank you for this helpful note. I have carefully re-read WP:LLM and reviewed the draft in detail. I do not believe any artefacts remain, particularly as I only used ChatGPT marginally in drafting this article. I am therefore re-submitting this draft for review. Toometa (talk) 09:17, 29 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
  • Comment: Contains references with "source=chatgpt.com" in the URL. I have made no judgement on the rest of the draft content, but since ChatGPT has been used in the creation of this draft you must read WP:LLM and carefully review all the content of the draft to check for hallucinations, unsubstantiated text, non-existent references.
    If you are sure that no ChatGPT artefacts remain, you can re-submit this draft for review. qcne (talk) 20:54, 28 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
  • Comment: Awards that are not notable in themselves should not be included (and "Postnord logistics award" doesn't exactly inspire confidence!)
    I think Boozt may well be notable, but the draft is rather one-sided, with lots of minor details about run-of-the-mill matters, and nothing about the well-publicised criticism from Arbetsmiljöverket a couple of years ago, for instance. The staff list is irrelevant in an encyclopaedia article, and most of it has no source – where does the info about how long people have been with the company come from? (It makes no difference, because again, those details don't belong in the draft.) bonadea contributions talk 21:26, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.