Talk:Asset-based community development
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Merger proposal
I'm new to this and don't know how to go about fixing the fact that this article Asset-based community development is inferior to Asset-Based Community Development The URLs are the same except for the use of capital letters. They speak to the exact same subject. The description of ABCD below has some elements that could be easily combined into the better written article, but I don't want to cut off any established links by creating deleting the page. Can you help? -- ABCDMike 20 January 2009
- I guess I'd like to keep all the text from Asset-Based Community Development plus the second and third paragraph only from Asset-based community development. Please help!
Pnm (talk) 00:48, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
- Merge completed, as per your request. Dogears (talk) 12:24, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks!
- Is there a way to fix the caps of the article title? It's not a proper name, so Asset-based community development is the better name.
Update
I have an update proposal, see here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Srmjohns/sandbox. We are combining the Introduction and ABCD Institute sections and adding several new sections. We are also cleaning up the Further Readings Section and External Links section so it is more streamlined. Srmjohns (talk) 22:07, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Peer review and responses during the educational assignment in Winter 2015
This is really well written--very concise in the wikipedia/encyclopedia-esque manner. At some point one of the sentences has a period and no space between the next sentence, so maybe do a quick read-through and make sure every period has a space after it! I also really enjoy the visual you created--was that original? Nice job--succinctly helps to gauge what asset mapping is. It reads well and the page looks clean. --Ann Marie Elmayan Amelmayan (talk) 14:10, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
I agree that this is clean, clear, concise. I made a few small grammar and formatting suggestions, in bold. Hmhanlon (talk) 18:18, 9 March 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Srmjohns (talk • contribs)
Critique for Spring 2017
The current state of this article is a good starting point to expand on this article in the future. It does not have many sources, but it does make extensive use of what sources are already present. I like how this article discusses the theory that makes up this method and other related community-based efforts. However, I also had some questions for future editors to possibly cover:
- How has this method of community development been critiqued?
- Are there any real-world examples of this theory being applied?
Overall, I enjoyed reading this article and want to see someone develop it further! Ekcy (talk) 16:13, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
I have also added a new statement and source in the Ethics section to further explain the purpose of ABCD. Ekcy (talk) 16:43, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
I agree that this article has a good start. The information presented is neutral and there is a good variety of sources. Including examples of successes using this method as well as comparing it more explicitly to other methods of community development would be helpful to add to the article. Emilybemmily (talk) 02:35, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Update proposal
This is my first try at updating a Wikipedia article. I want to learn how to do this so I can get my Community-Based Research for the Nonprofit Sector learn how to do a Wikipedia assignment in Winter 2027. I will add a sentence that offers how ABCD as a method of community developed has been critiqued. I will also provide some real-world examples of this theory being applied. ResearchForGood (talk) 15:59, 11 June 2026 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.