Draft:Viewership Theory
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Submission declined on 16 June 2025 by Bunnypranav (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.
Declined by Bunnypranav 11 months ago.LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice. These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies:
Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. See the advice page on large language models for more information. |
Comment: According to this article, the theory is one proposed by a single scholar and quite recently. Until it is a theory used by dozens of scholars, it is not really necessary for it to have its own standalone article. One or two sentences on this concept could plausibly be added to reception theory, though too much detail there would be WP:UNDUE. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 06:58, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment: Please provide page numbers for the books cited. Ca talk to me! 15:59, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
Viewership Theory is a proposed idea in film studies that focuses on how people watch films in different ways depending on their cultural background and historical context. Rather than treating viewing as just a mental process of understanding meaning, this theory looks at the deeper, older roots of watching — including rituals, light, shadow, and early visual traditions. It suggests that the experience of seeing itself is shaped by long-standing cultural practices, not just by the content of the film.
Origins and Development
The idea was introduced by Iranian writer and filmmaker Alireza Kaveh [1] in his book Film Genre: Tone and Ideology.[2] He suggests that cinema is not just a modern invention, but part of a longer history of how people have gathered around sources of light — such as fire & ritual fires, sunlight in caves, or shadow plays — to experience stories visually. These early ways of looking, shaped by ceremonies or social rituals, form what Kaveh calls the foundation of cinematic spectatorship.
Theoretical Context
Viewership Theory is related to ideas from reception theory, which often focuses on how people interpret media and make meaning from it. But instead of concentrating on interpretation, this theory puts more emphasis on what it means to "see" — and how that act of seeing has developed through culture and history.
It shares some ground with psychoanalytic film theory, especially ideas from Jacques Lacan about the "mirror stage" and how viewers identify with images on screen.[3] It also overlaps with the work of Slavoj Žižek, who explored how films reflect unconscious desires and ideologies in The Pervert's Guide to Cinema.[4]
Visual Representation
This visual representation highlights a central premise of **Viewership Theory**: that cinematic experience originates in the human encounter with projected light and shadow. Rather than treating cinema merely as a narrative or technical system, the theory emphasizes the primordial conditions of perception — light, darkness, reflection, and the embodied position of the spectator — as the foundation of cinematic meaning.
Postcolonial thinkers like Robert Stam and Ella Shohat have talked about how Western ideas of film viewing are not universal.[5] Viewership Theory builds on that by paying attention to non-Western traditions, ceremonies, and ways of seeing that have shaped visual storytelling long before cinema existed.
See also
References
- ^ Mansour, Layla (2025-05-29). "Reframing Genre through Iranian Lens: Alireza Kaveh's Cinematic Taxonomy". Medium. Retrieved 2025-06-16.
- ^ Kaveh, Alireza. Film Genre: Tone and Ideology (in Persian). Rozanehkar.
- ^ Metz, Christian (1982). The Imaginary Signifier: Psychoanalysis and the Cinema. Indiana University Press.
- ^ Žižek, Slavoj (2006). The Pervert's Guide to Cinema. Verso.
- ^ Shohat, Ella; Stam, Robert (1994). Unthinking Eurocentrism: Multiculturalism and the Media. Routledge. ISBN 0415063256.
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.

- provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.