Submission declined on 9 February 2026 by OrangeWaylon (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that: provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles; are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight; are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content. Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by OrangeWaylon 3 months ago. Last edited by OrangeWaylon 3 months ago. Reviewer: Inform author. Resubmit Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Submission declined on 20 January 2026 by Politicdude (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that: provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements; are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight; are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content. Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Politicdude 4 months ago.

Submission declined on 14 January 2026 by Pythoncoder (talk). This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content. LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice. These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies: hallucinations: they often invent false information and cite non-existent references. unencyclopedic tone: they tend to be vague, promotional, or essay-like, rather than neutral and factual. copyright issues: they may closely paraphrase existing text, leading to copyright violations. Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. See the advice page on large language models for more information. Declined by Pythoncoder 4 months ago.

• Comment: it's unclear if the listed sources are actually independent, as many seem like press releases or paid articles. ~Politicdude (talk, contribs) 17:20, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

ProcurePro is an Australian construction procurement software company founded in 2021 and headquartered in Brisbane, Australia. It develops cloud-based tools for head contractors to manage subcontractor procurement workflows.^[1] The software has been used on projects in Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and Ireland, and the company has raised venture-capital funding.^[2]

ProcurePro was founded in Brisbane in 2021 by Alastair Blenkin, Tom Newby, Nathan Dench, Jesse Dymond and Tim Rogers, who had backgrounds in law, construction management, enterprise software development and product design.^[3][2]

Early coverage described the platform as software intended to replace manual administrative processes in construction procurement workflows.^[4][5] Reported early users included builders such as Roberts & Co., Hansen Yuncken, Richard Crookes Construction, AW Edwards, and Hutchinson Builders.^[6]

In January 2024, ProcurePro raised A$6.15 million in a Series A funding round led by AirTree Ventures and Saniel Ventures, with expansion into the United Kingdom cited as a planned use of funds.^[2][7]

Following the Series A raise, co-founders Tim Rogers and Alastair Blenkin relocated to the United Kingdom to oversee expansion efforts.^[2] In October 2024, construction industry publication PBC Today reported that ProcurePro had surpassed £25 billion in construction project value processed through the platform and was handling around 1,000 contracts per month.^[6]

The same article listed UK users, including Mount Anvil, Legacie Developments and Kori Construction and quoted Blenkin as saying the company had secured venture funding to enter a new market and was addressing delays in UK construction procurement workflows.^[6]

ProcurePro provides a cloud-based procurement platform for head contractors. Coverage has described the software as supporting tendering, contract creation, and vendor management functions for construction procurement.^[8]

• ProcurePro official website