Submission declined on 1 April 2026 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers. Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute. Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed. This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that: provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles; are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight; are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content. Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by DoubleGrazing 2 months ago. Last edited by DoubleGrazing 2 months ago. Reviewer: Inform author. Resubmit Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

* There is already an article named OpenEd in the mainspace. This is a draft article. It is a work in progress open to editing by anyone. Please ensure core content policies are met before publishing it as a live Wikipedia article. Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs · Article logs · Draft logs. Last edited by DoubleGrazing (talk | contribs) 2 months ago. (Update) Finished drafting? Submit for review or Publish now

A major contributor to this Amikovid appears to have a close connection with its subject. It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view. Please discuss further on the talk page. See our advice if the article is about you and read our scam warning in case someone asks for money to edit this article. (Learn how and when to remove this message)

OpenEd (formerly known as My Tech High) is an American education service provider that manages public-private partnerships between local school districts and families opting for individualized or home-centered learning. Founded in 2009, the company facilitates state-funded educational reimbursements and provides access to third-party online curricula.

The company was founded in 2009 in Utah as My Tech High by Matt and Amy Bowman to bridge the gap between traditional public school funding and home-based education. Initially operating within Utah, the organization partnered with local public school districts to enroll homeschool students as part-time public school students, allowing them to access state education funds.^[1]

Over the following decade, the company expanded its operations into multiple states, including Colorado, Idaho, and Oregon. In 2024, following a leadership transition to CEO Isaac Morehouse, the company rebranded from My Tech High to OpenEd to reflect its broader focus on alternative and decentralized education models.^{[2][failed verification]}

OpenEd operates on a public-private partnership model. The company contracts with local public school districts to administer a program where students are officially enrolled in the district but complete their coursework remotely or at home.

In exchange for managing the enrollment and compliance reporting, OpenEd and the partner districts share the per-pupil state funding. A portion of this funding is then allocated to families via a "reimbursement wallet." Families can use these funds to purchase approved educational materials, technology, or enroll in third-party educational marketplaces and curricula, such as Outschool or Acellus. Students are typically required to check in periodically with a certified teacher to maintain their funding eligibility.^[3]

Because OpenEd's model relies on directing public education funds toward home-based learning, it has been the subject of regulatory scrutiny and legislative debate regarding accountability and the classification of students.

In Colorado, the program faced significant challenges regarding whether the education provided was "teacher-led" or "parent-led." In 2024, the Colorado State Board of Education proposed rule changes stipulating that instruction must be overseen by licensed teachers to qualify for public funding, putting the My Tech High model at risk for elementary-aged students.^[3] Several rural districts, such as the Vilas School District and Plainview School District, had relied heavily on enrolling online homeschoolers through OpenEd to boost their overall student counts and state funding. Following the tightening of state rules regarding eligible funding models, OpenEd ceased its operations in Colorado, leading to significant budget shortfalls for the rural districts that had utilized the program.^[4]

In its home state of Utah, the company's financial tracking and reimbursement processes were the subject of a 2024 Utah Legislative Audit. The audit examined the oversight mechanisms for how state educational funds were being utilized by families through the third-party provider, raising questions about accountability in decentralized public education funding.

The organization's model has also drawn caution from independent homeschooling advocacy groups. The Nevada Homeschool Network, among others, has warned that enrolling in such publicly funded partnerships legally changes a student's status from a "homeschooler" to a public school student, thereby subjecting families to state testing and public school regulations.