Draft article not currently submitted for review. This is a draft Articles for creation (AfC) submission. It is not currently pending review. While there are no deadlines, abandoned drafts may be deleted after six months. To edit or make changes to this draft, simply click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. To be accepted, a draft should: Show the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article by using multiple sources that meet four criteria. The sources should be (1) reliable (2) secondary (3) independent of the subject (4) talk about the subject in some depth. For some topics, there are alternative criteria. Be written from a neutral point of view Respect copyright and do not plagiarize. Do not copy-paste. It is strongly discouraged to write about either yourself or your business or employer. If you do so, you must declare it. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Last edited by Joseph11111121 (talk | contribs) 28 days ago. (Update) Submit the draft for review!

HANXS:

Hanx is an online community figure best known for founding a Discord server centered around boys’ love (BL) media,

(https://discord.gg/9tJX86Ect)

discussion, and related internet culture. Over time, the server developed a small but notably dedicated user base, with Hanx becoming associated with its highly specific moderation style, unusually long announcements, and recurring references to “community values” that were never fully explained. Although little verified information is publicly available about his personal life, Hanx has frequently been described by members as both “chronically online” and “surprisingly difficult to contact.”

A recurring topic of discussion surrounding Hanx is his self-described status as the adoptive parent of 13 children, a claim that has been referenced repeatedly in server conversations, profile biographies, and anniversary messages. The exact nature of these adoptions has remained intentionally ambiguous, with interpretations ranging from literal guardianship to symbolic online mentorship. Despite the uncertainty, the number itself became strongly associated with Hanx’s online identity, eventually evolving into a meme within the community. Former members have noted that nearly every major server event somehow returned to the subject, often without clear context.

Under Hanx’s administration, the server underwent numerous restructurings, rebrandings, and channel reorganizations, many of which were announced through multi-paragraph updates that provided extensive detail while revealing very little concrete information. These announcements frequently referenced “future plans,” “internal developments,” and “important changes moving forward,” though users often reported difficulty determining what had actually changed. Historians of internet subcultures have occasionally cited Hanx as an example of a niche online administrator whose influence stemmed less from visibility and more from persistent presence within a highly specific digital environment.