Draft:Griffith (unit)
Submission declined on 30 January 2026 by ChrysGalley (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Submission declined on 17 December 2025 by Wasianpower (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.
Declined by Wasianpower 5 months ago.
|
Submission declined on 21 November 2025 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
Declined by DoubleGrazing 6 months ago.
|
Comment: There are 5 sources linked with a name similar to that of the submitting editor, an unanswered COI question on their talk page, and a draft resubmitted without any changes since the last decline. The submitting editor would be well advised to go through the sourcing and text of this article to keep it in line with WP:42 before resubmitting it again. ChrysGalley (talk) 14:26, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
Comment: I'm only seeing trivial footnote mentions in the sourcing. The source that is to an online comment is an unreliable source, and the definition and usage sections currently are in need of sourcing. 🌸wasianpower🌸 (talk • contribs) 03:37, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
The griffith (symbol: Gf) is a proposed non-SI unit of the quantity expressed in pascal–metre to the one-half (Pa·m1/2), used in the context of fracture mechanics to quantify material resistance to crack propagation. The unit was suggested as a tribute to the British mechanical engineer Alan Arnold Griffith (1893–1963), whose pioneering work laid the foundations of modern fracture mechanics.
Definition
The griffith is defined as:
This unit corresponds to the same dimensions as the classical expression of fracture toughness terms used in linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM), where stress-intensity factors are commonly expressed in Pa·m1/2.
Common multiple unit of the griffith is the megagriffith (1 MGf = 106 Gf).
Origin and Proposal
The use of the unit was originally suggested by Pedro Rivero-Antúnez et al.,[1], and Prof. C. Ramadas and Mr. A. R. Jadhav [2] as a more intuitive and less cumbersome alternative to the expression Pa·m1/2. Their proposal intended to honour A. A. Griffith’s seminal contributions to the understanding of stress concentration, crack initiation, and brittle fracture.
The first documented proposal of the term griffith in an official international scientific context appears in a 2020 article by Rivero-Antúnez et al..[1]. In this work, the authors adopted the designation “griffith” (Gf) for the unit Pa·m1/2 when reporting fracture-related mechanical properties of alumina-based ceramics. According to the authors, their literature search revealed one earlier public discussion on the website iMechanica[2], where the possibility of naming the fracture toughness unit had been debated. Since then, it has been used in some other articles published at international journals [3][4][5]
Historical Background
The unit is named after Alan Arnold Griffith, who introduced the energy-based approach to fracture and established the relationship between crack size, applied stress, and failure in brittle solids. His classical 1921 paper, The Phenomena of Rupture and Flow in Solids, is recognized as one of the foundational works of modern fracture mechanics..[6]
Usage
Although the griffith is not an SI unit and is not formally recognized by standards organizations, it has been proposed as a convenient shorthand within the fracture mechanics community, particularly in scientific publications dealing with the mechanical characterization of brittle materials.
See also
- Fracture mechanics
- Fracture toughness
- Stress intensity factor
- Alan Arnold Griffith
- Linear elastic fracture mechanics
References
- ^ a b P. Rivero-Antúnez, R. Cano-Crespo, L. Esquivias, N. de la Rosa-Fox, C. Zamora-Ledezma, A. Domínguez-Rodríguez, V. Morales-Flórez, "Mechanical characterization of sol–gel alumina-based ceramics with intragranular reinforcement of multiwalled carbon nanotubes," Ceramics International, vol. 46, 2020, pp. 19723–19730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.04.285
- ^ a b Jadhav, Ajit R. (2007, 6 August). “Naming the SI Unit for Fracture Toughness (KIC)”. iMechanica – the web of mechanics and mechanicians. https://imechanica.org/comment/30363#comment-30363.
- ^ P. Rivero-Antúnez, R. Cano-Crespo, F. Sánchez-Bajo, A. Domínguez-Rodríguez, V. Morales-Flórez, "Reactive SPS for sol–gel alumina samples: Structure, sintering behavior, and mechanical properties", Journal of the European Ceramic Society, vol. 41, no. 11, 2021, pp. 5548–5557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.04.060
- ^ P. Rivero-Antúnez, V. Morales-Flórez, F. L. Cumbrera, L. Esquivias, "Rietveld analysis and mechanical properties of in situ formed La-β-Al2O3/Al2O3 composites prepared by sol-gel method", Ceramics International, vol. 48, no. 17, 2022, pp. 24462–24470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.05.058
- ^ P. Rivero-Antúnez, C. Zamora-Ledezma, F. Sánchez-Bajo, J. C. Moreno-López, E. Anglaret, V. Morales-Flórez, "Sol–gel method and reactive SPS for novel alumina–graphene ceramic composites", Journal of the European Ceramic Society, vol. 43, no. 3, 2023, pp. 1064–1077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2022.10.043
- ^ Griffith, A. A., "The Phenomena of Rupture and Flow in Solids," Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 221, 1921, pp. 163–198.
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.

- Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
- Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.
Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.