Draft:Ellipsar

Ellipsar is a theoretical model in astrophysics proposed in 2022 to describe ring-like explosions originating from massive stars that exhibit a flattened (oblate) geometry due to rapid rotation or binary interactions. The term "ellipsar" is a portmanteau of "ellipse" and "star", reflecting the elliptical iso-density contours of the progenitor star in two-dimensional axisymmetric simulations. The model was introduced by Marcus DuPont, Andrew MacFadyen, and Jonathan Zrake in a paper published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters.[1]

The model challenges traditional spherical or jet-like explosion paradigms by incorporating asphericity in the progenitor star, potentially explaining certain astronomical transients without requiring a central jet engine.

Background

Astronomical transients such as supernovae and gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are typically modeled as point-like explosions or collimated jets from spherically symmetric stars. However, observations and theoretical models indicate that many massive stars (>8–10 solar masses) are oblate due to rapid rotation or binary mass transfer, with flattening parameters (ε) up to 0.2.[1] The ellipsar model explores the hydrodynamic consequences of a point explosion in such aspherical progenitors.

Model Assumptions

The ellipsar model assumes:

  • A massive star progenitor, such as a helium Wolf-Rayet star (~18 M⊙, radius ~0.5 R⊙), evolved using software like MESA.[1]
  • Oblate spheroid geometry with flattening parameter ε = 1 - b/a, where a and b are semi-major and semi-minor axes, optimized at ε ≈ 0.05.
  • Point-like explosion at the core with energy E_exp ranging from 10^{51} to 10^{54} erg (fiducial: 5 × 10^{52} erg).
  • Cold gas approximation (p/ρ ~ 10^{-6}) in the progenitor and surrounding wind environment with density profile ρ_wind = A r^{-2}, A* = 0.1, v_wind = 10^3 km/s.
  • Axisymmetric 2D simulations, ignoring 3D effects, magnetic fields, or detailed rotation.

The stellar density profile is mapped from a 1D spherical model to an oblate form: ρ(r, θ) derived by replacing R_3 in ρ_{1D}(r) with R_ε(θ) = ab / √[(a cos θ)^2 + (b sin θ)^2], where a = R_3 (1 - ε)^{-1/3}, b = R_3 (1 - ε)^{2/3}.

Mathematical Formulation

The model employs relativistic hydrodynamics in 2D spherical polar coordinates (r, θ). Key equations include:

Density Profile

The 1D density is approximated as: with parameters R_1 = 0.0017 R, R_2 = 0.0125 R, R_3 = 0.65 R, k_1 = 3.25, k_2 = 2.57, ρ_c = 3 × 10^{-7} ρ (ρ = 3M / (4π R^3)).

For oblate mapping:

Explosion Pressure

for r < r_exp, where H is the Heaviside function, γ = 4/3.

Hydrodynamic Equations

Conservation laws in relativistic form:

  • Mass continuity:
  • Energy-momentum: , with , , η^{\mu\nu} Minkowski metric (-+++).
  • Equation of state:

Shock dynamics: Acceleration proportional to density gradient; polar shocks breakout first, forming lobes that collide obliquely at equator, creating high-pressure rings.

Deceleration Radius

, where M_iso is isotropic-equivalent mass.

Simulations

Simulations use the GPU-accelerated SIMBI code (Python/C++ with CUDA/ROCm), second-order Godunov method with minmod reconstruction (θ=2). Grid: 5609 radial zones (log-spaced), 4096 angular zones; domain r_in = 0.01 R to r_out = 200 R, θ ∈ [0, π].

Results

  • Optimal ε = 0.05 produces relativistic ejecta rings (Γβ >10 for high E_exp), confined to Δθ ~6° (~5% sky coverage).
  • Energy distribution: E_k,iso(>1) at equator 10× higher than poles; M_iso(>1, θ=90°) ~6 × 10^{27} g (~Earth mass).
  • Transients: Explains llGRBs, relativistic SNe, FBOTs; predicts distinct afterglows, high polarization, prolate remnants after ~1 year.
  • Cosmic rays: Potential source for 10^{15}–10^{18} eV particles in low-density environments.

Limitations

  • Restricted to 2D axisymmetry; neglects 3D instabilities, turbulence, magnetic fields, radiation losses, or clumpy CSM.
  • As of 2025, no direct observational evidence; remains speculative with limited follow-up research.

Potential Future Developments

Given the authors' expertise in high-energy astrophysics, ellipsar has moderate potential for validation through upcoming observatories like Rubin (2025+) or CTA (2027+), potentially within 5–10 years if 3D simulations and matching transients emerge.

References

  1. ^ a b c DuPont, Marcus; MacFadyen, Andrew; Zrake, Jonathan (2022-05-26). "Ellipsars: Ring-like Explosions from Flattened Stars". The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 931 (2): L31. arXiv:2202.04767. Bibcode:2022ApJ...931L..16D. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac6ded.

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.