Review waiting, please be patient. This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 4,489 pending submissions waiting for review. If the submission is accepted, then this page will be moved into the article space. If the submission is declined, then the reason will be posted here. In the meantime, you can continue to improve this submission by editing normally. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Reviewer tools Instructions · What links here · Adobe Learning Manager (talk: + · bio) · (log) · Copyvios report · reFill · Citation Bot · (Search: Google, Wikipedia) · Submitted 58 days ago by Malenia5493 (talk: D · +) · Last edited 43 days ago by Itcouldbepossible Warning: The page Adobe Learning ManagerAdobe Learning Manager redirects to Adobe Captivate. Please ensure it is not a copy or that this page is located at the correct title.

Submission declined on 30 March 2026 by ChrysGalley (talk). This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content. LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice. These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies: hallucinations: they often invent false information and cite non-existent references. unencyclopedic tone: they tend to be vague, promotional, or essay-like, rather than neutral and factual. copyright issues: they may closely paraphrase existing text, leading to copyright violations. Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. See the advice page on large language models for more information. This draft appears to be a duplicate of an existing article. Wikipedia does not permit multiple articles on the same topic. To improve the existing article, please edit it directly at Adobe Captivate. If the article is protected and you cannot edit it, propose your changes on the article's talk page. If you are writing about a different subject with the same name, ask the reviewer to rename your draft to distinguish it. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by ChrysGalley 2 months ago. Last edited by Itcouldbepossible 43 days ago. Reviewer: Inform author. This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review.

Submission declined on 26 March 2026 by Nil NZ (talk). This draft appears to be a duplicate of an existing article. Wikipedia does not permit multiple articles on the same topic. To improve the existing article, please edit it directly at Adobe Captivate. If the article is protected and you cannot edit it, propose your changes on the article's talk page. If you are writing about a different subject with the same name, ask the reviewer to rename your draft to distinguish it. Declined by Nil NZ 2 months ago.

Submission declined on 25 March 2026 by Bobby Cohn (talk). This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers. Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute. Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed. This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that: provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements; are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight; are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content. Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Bobby Cohn 2 months ago.

• Comment: A lot of discussion with the author on my talk page here, the present redirect is to a related yet distinct product, and I've rewritten the lead and some sections to make that more clear. Would future reviewers familiar with subjects and articles in the technology area be cognizant of this (and the prior declines) and review the article whole cloth? Many thanks, Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 20:04, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: There are signs of the use of AI / LLM, including incorrect markups/wikilinks and WP:AIATTR: "The LMS market has been evaluated by research firms such as Forrester and Gartner, which assess vendors based on criteria such as functionality, integration, and enterprise adoption." In addition this overlaps the existing article on Captivate, (but which is not wikilinked) ChrysGalley (talk) 09:59, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Adobe Learning Manager is a cloud-based learning management system (LMS) developed by Adobe Inc.. It is used by organizations to deliver and manage digital learning programs for employees, customers, and partners.^[1][2][3] It is to be used alongside to deliver content managed by Adobe Captivate.

The platform was originally released in 2015 as Adobe Captivate Prime and was later rebranded as Adobe Learning Manager.^[4]

In August 2015, Adobe Captivate 9 added new features including the ability to publish to the new Adobe LMS known as Captivate Prime.^[5]

Adobe Learning Manager operates within the learning management system (LMS) market, which includes platforms designed for enterprise training and digital learning delivery.

Other vendors in this market include Cornerstone OnDemand, Docebo, SAP Litmos, and TalentLMS.

The LMS market has been evaluated by research firms such as Forrester and Gartner, which assess vendors based on criteria such as functionality, integration, and enterprise adoption.^{[6][failed verification][7]}

Industry directories such as eLearning Industry list Adobe Learning Manager among platforms used for extended enterprise learning scenarios, including customer and partner training.^[3]

Adobe introduced the platform in 2015 under the name Adobe Captivate Prime as part of its digital learning and experience portfolio. The product was subsequently renamed Adobe Learning Manager to reflect its use across multiple learning audiences, including workforce training and external education programs.^[4]

Adobe Learning Manager includes features associated with enterprise learning management systems:

• Course and content management, including support for standards such as SCORM
• Learning paths and structured training programs
• Content recommendations based on user activity
• Reporting and analytics for tracking learner progress
• Integration with enterprise systems and third-party applications
• Support for employee, customer, and partner training

The platform is delivered as a software-as-a-service (SaaS) application.^[8]

Adobe Learning Manager incorporates machine learning techniques to support content recommendations and learner activity analysis. It also supports interoperability standards such as SCORM and integrates with enterprise systems and external content providers.^[8]

Organizations use Adobe Learning Manager for:

• Employee onboarding and training
• Customer education programs
• Partner and channel enablement
• Compliance and certification training

The system supports both internal and external learning programs.^[2]

Adobe Learning Manager has been listed on software review platforms and industry directories related to learning technologies.

In February 2024, Forrester Research evaluated Adobe Learning Manager as part of The Forrester Wave: Learning Management Systems and Experience Platforms, Q1 2024.^[2] The research examined 11 providers across 29 criteria including platform security, administrative capabilities, learner experience, integration with business applications, and support for generative AI.

The report placed Adobe Learning Manager in the Strong Performer category, noting "there’s room for growth in terms of integration with the HR ecosystem, as well as support for experiential learning."^{[citation needed]}

Adobe Learning Manager has also been included in analyst assessments. A report by Brandon Hall Group evaluated the platform's capabilities and market positioning based on analyst review and vendor briefings.^[9]

User reviews on platforms such as G2 and TrustRadius describe its use in enterprise learning environments and reference aspects such as usability, integration capabilities, and application in training workflows.^[1][2]

The platform has been included among companies recognized in the Learning Portal / Learning Management System category of the 2025 Training Magazine Network Choice Awards, a crowd-sourced industry awards program based on practitioner voting.^[10]

Gartner Peer Insights includes Adobe Learning Manager within its corporate learning technologies category, where it is evaluated based on user feedback and enterprise deployment considerations.^[11]

• E-learning
• Corporate training